In the News

Heavier trucks on interstate highways was voted down last week.

Just days after the highway reauthorization bill containing the measures was introduced in the House of Representatives.

Instead, the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee voted Feb. 2 to adopt an amendment calling for a study of the effects of bigger trucks on safety and infrastructure.

On Jan. 31, Rep. John Mica (R-Fla.), chairman of the committee, formally unveiled a five-year, $260 billion surface transportation bill — dubbed the American Energy and Infrastructure Jobs Act of 2012.

“This is the most important transportation reform bill since the creation of the interstate [highway system] in 1956,” Mica said.

His bill would have allowed states to permit trucks as heavy as 97,000 pounds with six axles on interstate highways. However, the heavier truck provision was defeated in committee by a 33-22 vote on Feb. 2.

Our highways are not built for this weight; our municipalities do not have the money,” said Rep. Lou Barletta (R-Pa.), who sponsored the amendment with Rep. Jerry Costello (D-Ill.).

Sean McNally, spokesman for American Trucking Associations, said ATA was disappointed the amendment deferring the weight change had passed.

“There have already been dozens and dozens of studies that show increasing truck productivity reduces truck miles traveled, which not only reduces accident risk, congestion and emissions but also will ultimately save money in reduced highway maintenance costs,” McNally said.

In the Senate, a two-year, $109 billion reauthorization bill has been approved by three committees. Bill sponsors said early in their deliberations they would not address issues such as bigger trucks because the controversy surrounding them would prevent passage of a bill.

If the House reauthorization bill passes and the larger truck study provision survives in conference with the Senate, the secretary of transportation would be directed to conduct a three-year study on heavier, longer trucks, including 5-axle vehicles that weigh 88,000 pounds.

The study would examine the effects on crash rates, vehicle-miles traveled, pavement performance, bridge reliability and other factors.

Mica’s original bill also would have required states that allow longer combination vehicles — those with three trailers — to increase the routes on which the LCVs are allowed to run. That provision was removed, said Darrin Roth, director of highway operations for ATA.

Roth said another provision, requiring that states allow rigs with double trailers up to 33 feet long each, was still in the House bill, as of press time.

In addition, a measure that allows trucks weighing 126,000 pounds to run on 25-mile segments of an interstate, providing they have special permits, was still alive.

While the trucking industry praised Mica’s bill for including increased size-and-weight proposals, the plan encountered heavy opposition from railroads, labor and highway safety groups.

“Americans don’t want 97,000-pound trucks or huge multitrailers up to 120 feet long on our nation’s highways,” said Ed Hamberger, president of the Association of American Railroads. “Nor is it fair that even more of the public’s tax dollars will be used to pay for the road and bridge damage inflicted by massive trucks.”

Before the House committee addressed the Mica bill, Rep. Jim McGovern (D-Mass.) said the provision for bigger trucks was a “poison pill” that would sink reauthorization efforts.

When he introduced the bill, Mica said it was free of earmarks. He said it is up to the House Republican leadership to find the funding for the bill.

On Feb. 1, the House Energy Committee passed a bill that Republicans said would help pay for transportation by expanding drilling offshore and on the North Slope of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge.

Transportation projects and programs are now supported largely by revenue from federal fuel taxes, although that money has fallen short in recent years, requiring supplemental funds.

Democrats said expanded drilling would produce only $5 billion, which would not be realized in time and is not enough to cover what Democrats said is a $50 billion shortfall.

The House bill contains other provisions welcomed by the trucking industry, such as the establishment of a drug and alcohol clearinghouse for driver records, crashworthiness standards for trucks and a study of the 34-hour restart in the hours-of-service rule (see story, p. 34).

The House and Senate bills also would establish a national freight program to facilitate the movement of goods, but the House bill leaves more control over the program to the states.

Unlike the Senate reauthorization bill, which would mandate electronic onboard recorders for all trucks, the House bill would have the transportation secretary establish only EOBR standards.

Source: Transport Topics

Truck freight rose 10.5% in December, the fastest pace in 13 years, as surges in manufacturing and inventory restocking propelled American Trucking Associations’ tonnage index to a record high.

The seasonally adjusted index reached 124.5, the trade group reported on Jan. 24, achieving the greatest year-over-year percentage growth since July 1998 and pushing the index above the previous high mark of 121.6 in January 2005.

“Not only did truck tonnage increase due to solid manufacturing output in December but also from some likely inventory re-stocking,” said Bob Costello, ATA’s chief economist, who also said he was surprised by the magnitude of the gain.

“Inventories, especially at the retail level, are exceedingly lean, and I suspect that tonnage was higher than expected as the supply chain did some restocking during the month,” Costello said.

During 2011, tonnage rose 5.9%, which also was the largest annual rise since 1998.

Month-to-month comparisons were equally favorable.

The index spiked 6.8% in December above November, eclipsing the 0.3% sequential increase in the prior month. The month-to-month improvement was the fastest since January 2005.

The trucking report underscored the strengthening economic picture.

The Federal Reserve on Jan. 18 announced a 0.9% rise in factory output in December, which was the highest growth pace in all of last year. Among the growth sectors were wood products, metals, machinery, plastics and chemicals.

In addition, the Commerce Department said on Jan. 26 that orders for goods meant to last three years or more climbed 3%, adding to the positive momentum.

For the full year, manufacturing activity as measured by industrial production rose 4.9% on the heels of 5.8% growth in 2010, ATA reported on Jan. 20. Though the increases were healthy, production still trails the record year of 2007 by 8.5%.

“Manufacturing remains an engine of growth,” said John Herrmann, a senior fixed-income strategist at State Street Global Markets LLC in Boston, told Bloomberg News on Jan. 18, when he accurately forecast the December gain in factory output. “Manufacturing has benefited from exports to emerging markets. The more resilient those economies are, the better it is for U.S. manufacturing.”

While output grew, inflation remained tame, with consumer prices unchanged on a month-to-month basis in December and just 3% higher than a year earlier. Meanwhile, unemployment has fallen to a three-year low of 8.5%.

Other industry sources also noted wide-ranging progress.

“We expect truckers to benefit from inventory restocking, as holiday freight volumes were strong in December, coupled with low store inventories,” said Justin Yagerman, an analyst at Deutsche Bank. “We expect freight demand to remain seasonally strong during January/February, given solid retail sales (up 6.3% year-to-year in December) coupled with low inventories, growing consumer confidence, and stable income levels.”

Costello said that he believes tonnage will continue to show increases this year but not at the brisk pace of 2011.

Yagerman said trucking and other freight businesses will continue to see solid demand early this year because of “inventory restocking, positive manufacturing activity trends, solid retail sales growth and sustained improvements in the leading economic indicators.”

The Conference Board released a report Jan. 26 that showed a 0.4% increase in December on top of a 0.5% increase in November over October.

Also on a positive note was a Jan. 25 report from the National Association of Realtors that agreements to sell previously owned homes were at a 19-month high, possibly signaling a recovery for the housing market.

Still another indicator of strong demand last month was a Jan. 25 report from load-board operator TransCore, Portland, Ore., which said its North American Freight Index rose 11%.

That indicator, which measures spot market freight available on its load board, now has been at its highest level since 2005 for the past four months.

From the shipper side, a Dahlman Rose & Co. survey found that 42% of shippers surveyed in the fourth quarter were more confident that the economy is moving in a positive direction, analyst Jason Seidl said. That was a sharp improvement from the third-quarter survey when just 10% of customers showed growing confidence.

“Business conditions continue to improve, and responses indicate the rate of improvement is accelerating,” said a Jan. 25 report from UBS Securities that was based on a carrier survey. It was the eighth consecutive quarterly survey in which fleets noted improving business.

Source: Transport Topics

U.S. truckers closed out the year with a surge of heavy-duty truck buying.

The buying spree led to the highest-volume month and highest-volume year since 2006, according to data from WardsAuto.com. Sales boomed 78.3% in December and 59.9% for the year, compared with 2010.

The Jan. 12 report said original equipment manufacturers sold 20,939 Class 8 trucks last month, compared with 11,742 in December 2010. The annual U.S. total jumped to 171,358 from 107,152 in 2010.

Sales have been highly volatile in recent years, rising to a record in 2006 and then falling to an extraordinarily low level in 2009. The 2011 figure was fairly typical by historical standards, the fifth-best year in the last 12.

Volvo Trucks recorded the most explosive growth for both the month and the year, with gains of 170.1% and 108.8%, respectively.

“The performance of our broad dealer network helped achieve an improved customer mix, and our fuel-efficiency leadership means we’re well-positioned as fleets intensify their focus on lowering fuel costs,” Ron Huibers, Volvo’s president of North American truck sales and marketing, said in a statement on the Ward’s report.

Huibers also gave credit to Volvo’s in-house engine and transmission options for pushing December sales to 3,276 vehicles from 1,213 a year earlier. Annual sales rose to 20,955 units, as Volvo was the fourth most popular brand for the month and fifth most popular for the year.

“Kenworth had a bang-up good year, but that was driven by pockets of high sales in the energy patch,” said Cooper Sykes, a Kenworth Trucks dealer with 10 locations in North Carolina.

Kenworth sales more than doubled for the month, jumping 105.3% to 3,074 from 1,497. Annual sales rose 94.3% to 22,577 big trucks, giving the OEM fifth place for the month and fourth for the year.

Peterbilt Motors, like Kenworth a part of Paccar Inc., was third for the month and year, posting a 93.2% increase in December as sales jumped to 3,327 units from 1,722.

Annual sales rose 89.4% to 24,583 units.


Kenworth and Peterbilt executives have said recently that energy-sector sales have been very good but also that they have increased business with for-hire carriers in general.

Sykes said he hopes the sales recovery does not stall because the gain has yet to hit the Tar Heel state. Companies working in or with the oil, natural gas and coal industries have been able to buy a lot of trucks this year, he said, but North Carolina’s staples of tobacco, textiles, furniture and construction are not booming at all. Sykes said his heavy-duty sales volume rose just 10% from 2010 to 2011.

“We’ve bottomed out, and there’s been improvement but not 100%,” said Sykes of the North Carolina trucking economy — and the Southeast in general.

Freightliner remained the top-selling brand for the year nationally and is producing at close to capacity. At a recent event, two of the OEM’s top executives said the company soon will hire more production workers to expand capacity and that last year’s production was completely booked up by mid-May, which may have led customers to shop elsewhere for trucks.

Freightliner sold 5,461 trucks last month, a 59.7% increase over the 3,419 the previous December. Annual sales rose 50.6% to 52,276 heavy trucks.

Mack Trucks, a part of the Volvo Group, came in sixth for the month and year. The company sold 1,720 big trucks for the month, a 10.3% improvement over the 1,559 at the end of 2010. Annual sales rose 40.4% to 12,928.

Cement mixers and dump trucks have long been a key part of Mack’s business, and with the construction industry still in the doldrums, its sales have not rebounded as strongly as some. In 2011, Mack emphasized selling its Pinnacle highway tractors to over-the-road carriers.


Western Star Trucks, a sister company to Freightliner within Daimler Trucks North America, manufactures trucks in small numbers for some of the most severe-service applications. The company enjoyed a 137.6% increase as monthly sales jumped to 278 heavy trucks from 117. Annual sales rose 78.5% to 2,090 vehicles.

During the year, there were some changes on the corporate level at the four OEMs that produce the seven brands of heavy-duty trucks.

Kenworth and Peterbilt, the Paccar companies, combined to eclipse DTNA’s two brands for the lead in monthly sales in December. DTNA’s Freightliner and Western Star Trucks usually combine for first place.

Paccar also switched places with Navistar in 2011 market share, moving up to second place from third.

And Volvo Group remained in fourth place but, based on growth at Volvo Trucks, closed the gap with third-place Navistar.


Source: Transport Topics

Tire manufacturers say that a shortage of materials combined with soaring global demand, has driven up costs of commercial tires.

Prices for “natural rubber and, later, synthetic rubbers, increased to unprecedented levels during 2010 and 2011. They have gone up . . . [to] levels which are still unprecedented in modern history,” said Walter Weller, vice president of China Manufacturers Alliance, Monrovia, Calif., which makes Double Coin tires.

“At the same time, steel, carbon black and oil have all increased continuously — not to mention transportation costs,” Weller explained in an e-mail. “The tire industry —right, wrong or indifferent — chose to implement increases in stages over this period of time and, for some manufacturers, more increases are needed, which is why you continue to see them.”

He added: “I would say that the more recent increases are probably a reflection of oil/carbon black/steel price increases than natural rubber.”

In addition to Double Coin, other manufacturers that raised prices include Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., Akron, Ohio; Bridgestone Americas, Nashville, Tenn.; Yokohama Tire, Fullerton, Calif.; Continental Tire the Americas, Fort Mill, S.C.; and Toyo Tire USA, Cypress, Calif.

Michelin North America Inc. and Hankook Tire America Corp. did not respond to requests for comment by the time this story went to press.

“We see supply being short of demand for the near term — for sure, the next one to two years,” said Donn Kramer, Goodyear’s director of product marketing.

Kramer said that on Nov. 1, Goodyear raised U.S. prices on all brands of commercial tires, retreads and tread rubber by up to 10%.

And although Bloomberg News recently reported that the price of natural rubber has dropped by approximately 50% from its high in February 2011, Keith Price, Goodyear’s director of national media relations, said, “Most tire manufacturers use first-in, first-out accounting, [which results in about] a two-quarter lag on raw material costs on finances.”

“Say we’re buying natural rubber today and it’s lower than it was six months ago; it’s going to take five, six months for that to show up in our product cost,” he said.

Source: Transport Topics

Many truckers started the new year digging deeper into their pockets due to imposed higher tolls.

Carriers traveling the New Jersey Turnpike are facing some of the biggest increases, as drivers of five-axle trucks using E-ZPass during off-peak hours must now shell out $43.20 to travel the length of the highway. This is $15 more than what was paid in 2011.

For those paying cash, the cost is $49.75, up from $32.50. Peak tolls for trucks are $45.45 with E-ZPass, up from $29.70, and $49.75 for cash, up from $32.50.

The increases don’t sit well with truckers in the state, some of whom warn New Jersey might lose businesses to neighboring states.


“It’s going to end up pushing people to Pennsylvania,” said Jason Dameo, general manager at Dameo Trucking Inc. in Bridgewater, N.J.

Dameo said many believe tolls only affect trucks rolling through New Jersey on their way to other states and that local businesses can avoid higher tolls.

“But us local guys are getting killed,” Dameo said. “It now costs us over $100 to go to Long Island.”

The reason trips between New Jersey and Long Island are so expensive now is that the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey raised tolls at tunnels and bridges into New York City, partly to fund the rebuilding of the World Trade Center.

On Jan. 1, truckers using E-ZPass began paying $2 more per axle and they will pay an additional $2 per axle increase each year from 2012 to 2015, the Port Authority said.

The Maryland Transportation Authority imposed a $6 hike on five-axle trucks using Baltimore Harbor crossings. It now costs $18 to traverse the Fort McHenry Tunnel (Interstate 95, Interstate 395), Baltimore Harbor Tunnel (Interstate 895) and Francis Scott Key Bridge (Interstate 695).


The toll for five-axle trucks is now $36 to use the JFK Memorial Highway (I-95) and Thomas J. Hatem Memorial Bridge (U.S. 40) in Maryland. The tolls were $30.

It now costs $24 for five-axle trucks at the Harry W. Nice Memorial Bridge (U.S. 301) and William Preston Lane Jr. Memorial Bay Bridge (U.S. 50/301). The toll was $15.

“Sometimes, you don’t have a choice in Maryland. We do load in Baltimore so we can’t go around toll roads,” said Barbara Cober, who is secretary-treasurer at liquid bulk hauler Shipley Transport, Sykesville, Md.

On Jan. 1, the cost for five-axle trucks to travel the entire 241-mile length of the Ohio Turnpike became $35 with an E-ZPass and $44 without. This was an increase from $32 with E-ZPass and $40 without, said Lauren Hakos, spokeswoman for the Ohio Turnpike Commission.

On the Pennsylvania Turnpike, tolls for five-axle trucks without E-ZPass rose to $9.85 from $8.95. The increase applies to all vehicle classes on all Turnpike sections except the Southern Beltway (Turnpike 576) in Allegheny and Washington counties, where rates are unchanged, the agency’s website said.


One industry observer said state agencies are more inclined to impose toll hikes as truck and car drivers increase their use of electronic payment systems.

“Because people use transponders, these days you can do a lot of smaller increases that don’t have to be rounded to the dollar,” said Peter Samuel, editor of Toll Road News in Frederick, Md. “The problem now is these toll increases are being used as cash cows.”

Tolls also went up on Virginia’s Dulles Toll Road and E-470 in Denver on Jan. 1 and on South Carolina’s Southern Connector the next day.

As a result of New Jersey’s toll increases, a new bill was proposed in Congress that would give oversight of toll increases back to the U.S. Department of Transportation.

The Commuter Protection Act, sponsored by Sen. Frank Lautenberg (D-N.J.) and Rep. Michael Grimm (R-N.Y.) would let DOT determine whether tolls are “just and reasonable.”

Source: Transport Topics

Trucking may be on the cusp of one of its most profitable rides ever as freight demand in 2012 pushes against the limits of industry capacity.


The new year also could be historic in terms of regulatory changes, as federal officials continue to push for a ban on texting and cellphone use as part of a campaign against distracted driving. The Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration is expected to issue new rules on driver hours of service and require the use of electronic onboard re-corders, while the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration is expected to implement a proposal to require electronic stability control systems on new heavy-duty trucks.

Congress will have to deal with highway funding legislation and may tackle proposals to increase truck weight limits and to provide federal oversight of bridge and tunnel tolls.

And, of course, it’s a presidential election year.

That makes Bill Graves, president of American Trucking Associations,“somewhat pessimistic” that much will get done in Washington.

“I think the die is pretty much cast as to what the relationship between Republicans and Democrats is going to be. So in that regard, if there are things that you want to see get done, you may be disappointed; 2012 may not be a very productive year.”

From a business perspective, the view is much more positive.

“The domestic freight market remains remarkably resilient,” David Tamberrino, an analyst for the investment firm Stifel, Nicolaus & Co., said in a report published Dec. 5.

“Supply and demand in the trucking sector are in balance, even though demand has recovered only about two-thirds of what it lost in the Great Recession,” he said.

Tamberrino said he expects freight rates to rise faster than inflation in 2012, and for both truck and rail operators to enjoy expanding profit margins.

A survey by Transport Capital Partners found that 61% of trucking executives surveyed in November expect volumes to increase in 2012, up from 45% in August, with only 2% of carriers expecting volumes to decrease, compared with 7.5% in August.

Three out of four executives surveyed said they also expect freight rates to increase.

“Most economists are seeing growth in the economy,” said Richard Mikes, a partner in Transport Capital Partners. “This is pushing more freight onto a very limited truck base, with shippers and brokers scrambling for trucks.”

Economists Nariman Behravesh and Nigel Gault of IHS Global Insight, an economic forecasting firm that provides data and analysis of freight trends to American Trucking Associations, said they expect the rate of gross domestic product growth to rise from 1.4% in 2011 to 1.6% in 2012.

“It remains a very muted expansion,” Behravesh and Gault said in a report published in November.

“We expect at least a mild recession in the eurozone, starting in the current quarter,” the economists reported. “That hurts export demand and corporate earnings, but not enough to tip the United States into recession.”

The risk of recession rises if Greece defaults on its debt “in a disorderly manner” and disrupts European and global banking systems, the report stated.

Another note of caution was struck by Andreas Renschler, head of Daimler AG’s truck unit, who said waning confidence, if it persists, could turn a modest slowdown in the global economy “into an outright recession.”

“We are monitoring the developments very closely, but we don’t see any reason for panic,” Renschler said in remarks prepared for the Tokyo Motor Show on Nov. 30.

ATA Chief Economist Bob Costello said he expects production and sales of new trucks and trailers to remain strong in the next year, as fleets continue to replace older equipment while at the same time keeping a lid on fleet expansion.

“There will be small capacity additions,” Costello said in a briefing for industry executives in late October. “But it looks like companies are doing it only where they have business.”

Other factors — including a possible reduction in the number of hours each day drivers can be behind the wheel and higher costs for equipment and fuel — will make it difficult for many trucking companies to expand.

“I don’t expect an oversupply of trucks anytime soon,” Costello said.

To stay ahead of rising operating costs, officials at GE Capital said fleet operators will need to continue to push up pricing in the year ahead.

“A lot of fleets like to compare rates to pre-recession levels,” said Dan Clark, head of GE Capital’s Transportation Finance Group. “They see they are at or above that level and are reluctant to go over. They need to use that old price and add ‘X’ amount. They cannot be satisfied where they are at.”

A survey conducted by CK Commercial Vehicle Research also shows solid demand for commercial trucks.

Company spokesman Chris Kemmer said 84% of survey participants who operate heavy-duty Class 8 vehicles and 33% of operators of medium-duty vehicles said they plan to purchase new equipment in 2012.

The orders for new equipment represent about 16% of the current population of commercial vehicles, and only one in four fleets said that they plan to add some capacity, Kemmer said.

Transport and logistics companies continue to invest in technology in order to make operations more efficient and respond to customer requirements.

A survey of chief information officers by the London-based media and event organizer eyefortransport.com found transportation management systems to be the most common area for investment, with 53% of respondents looking to buy in the next year, followed by mobile technology (44%), business intelligence (43%), customer relationship management (41%), electronic data interchange (39%) and track and trace (36%).

New labor management systems also are expected to gain favor, as fleet operators struggle to recruit and retain enough qualified drivers and mechanics and comply with new hours-of-service and safety regulations.

Mike Maris, senior director of transportation for Motorola Solutions, said he expects to see more consolidation among technology suppliers and greater use of hands-free devices in the truck cab.

The need for investment in technology, along with the improving financial position of motor carriers, is expected to spur mergers and acquisitions in 2012.

“Banks are still very reluctant to loan small trucking companies money,” said Andy Ahern of transportation consulting firm Ahern & Associates in a newsletter published in November. “So, there will be a substantial consolidation of trucking and logistics companies.”

A proposed change in how leases are accounted for on corporate balance sheets, however, could have a widespread detrimental effect on the U.S. economy, triggering a $10 billion reduction in GDP and 60,000 fewer jobs by 2016, according to a report issued by the Equipment Leasing and Finance Association in December.

The Financial Accounting Standards Board and the International Accounting Standards Board plan to issue a final draft of the new accounting rules in April.

The rules would require companies to record virtually all leases as debt rather than an operating expense on their balance sheets.

Such a change would add an estimated $2 trillion in debt to balance sheets of companies in a wide range of industries, including transportation, retail and manufacturing, utilities and construction firms.

“Many businesses do not object to having to record leases on their books,” ELFA officials said. “Rather, they object to how the proposal would require them to account for and report lease transactions, contending that aspects of the proposal are too complex, impose burdensome regulation on businesses and do not accurately reflect the economics of the lease transaction.”

ELFA said that it wants the accounting boards to preserve a distinction between capital leases and operating leases and to offer relief from some of the reporting requirements in order to reduce the negative consequences of the proposal on the U.S. economy.

Source: Transport Topics

Fatalities involving large trucks increased 8.7% in 2010.
 
The first increase in four years, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration said last week.

NHTSA said in its annual report that 3,675 people died in truck-related accidents in 2010, an increase of 295 from the 2009 total of 3,380.

In addition, the number of people injured in truck-related accidents rose to 19,000 in 2010, from 17,000 in 2009, a 12% increase.

At the same time, truck occupant fatalities increased by 6%, to 529 in 2010 from 499 in 2009.

“We’re still trying to figure out clearly what [caused] this uptick,” NHTSA Administrator David Strickland said at the Dec. 8 press conference where the report was unveiled.

Increased truck traffic because of the economic recovery could be a factor, he said. The Federal Highway Administration tracks truck miles traveled each year but is not expected to complete its 2010 mileage analysis until next month.

This slow economic recovery is not as unusual as many people think, and trucking continues to outperform it.

This slow economic recovery is not as unusual as many people think, and trucking continues to outperform it, said trucking economy expert Noel Perry Thursday - and there are signs it will continue to do so, including signs we may be nearing the end of the housing slump.

In FTR's "State of Freight" webinar, Perry, who is a senior consultant to the transportation research company, as well as principal of his own firm, Transport Fundamentals, showed a slide showing that while recovery from the most recent recession is historically one of the slower ones, it tracks almost exactly with the recovery from the 2001 downturn.

"Recoveries have gotten slower over time," he said. "What this says is the behavior of the economy this time is actually pretty predictable. It also says we're not having a weak recovery, we're having a normal one. If the last recovery was good for you, this one should be the same. This is not doom and gloom at all."

Perry says the forecast for U.S. GDP is expected to grow between 2.5% and 3% next year.

Of course, he said, there are some downside risks, including a likely recession in Europe, a stagnating global economy, China's real estate bubble, and longer-term, the U.S. debt.

Another graph illustrated one way this recovery IS different from past ones: truckload growth and industrial production growth are growing more rapidly than gross domestic product.

"So even though the economy is sort of slow from a GDP standpoint, from a transportation perspective, it's not. This has been a pretty good time for transportation, and these facts show it pretty clearly."

More good news, Perry said, is that we are beginning to see signs of a modest housing recovery. Data from the Calculated Risk blog shows the inventory of existing homes is now back down to below 3 million units, which is the level it was at in 2005, "so king of in a normal range."

When there's a large surplus of existing homes, people aren't going to build new homes, with all their attendant truckloads of building materials and big-ticket consumer durable goods to put in them. This data, Perry said, suggested we may be close to consuming that surplus, and people may start building again.

In fact, partly because of that, Perry is optimistic about the outlook for flatbed carriers.

Overall, Perry said, expect moderate growth in the U.S. truckload business next year, in the 2% to 4% range.

Trucking will face a driver shortage next year, Perry said, the worst of which will likely hit in late 2012 as more government regulations on drivers start taking effect.

That, of course, will affect pricing, and Perry says there is growing evidence that truckers are getting a big bolder when it comes to rate increases. When you take into account fuel surcharges, he said, he's expecting 7% to 9% increases next year for truckload, while LTL may be up in the double digits by the end of the year.

But don't just expect rate increases to fall in your lap, Perry said, capacity crunch or no. When asked how fleets can take advantage of these rate increases, Perry said, "You take advantage of pricing opportunities by organizing to do so. You have to change your culture and put in a price increase plan," which involves training the sales force. "A lot of fleets don't do so, and end up falling behind."

Source: TruckingInfo.com


 

Chemicals that treat ice and snow create the biggest problems for the life of your tires!

The life expectancy of heavy-duty truck wheels depends primarily on where a truck runs, with regions where roads are subjected to chemicals that are used to reduce ice and snow creating the biggest problems, according to experts.

Ryder System Inc. is “definitely seeing corrosion of wheels and other components in areas where they are using magnesium and other chlorides,” said Scott Perry, vice president of supply management for the company’s fleet management solutions division. “As they moved away from salt to more advanced chemicals, there’s been more adhesions to vehicles” — and more damage.

Ryder, Miami, has about 165,000 vehicles at 850 locations in the United States and Canada.


“Our fleet is in all areas — the good and the bad,” Perry said, referring to weather conditions. In some places, a new wheel might last 10 years, while “in areas where [chemicals] are used heavily for snow and ice, it could be as short as three years,” Perry said.

Colorado was “the canary in the mine” that alerted the trucking industry to the dangers of these chemicals, said Robert Braswell, technical director of American Trucking Associations’ Technology & Maintenance Council. The state was an early adopter of aggressive de-icers such as magnesium chloride to clear roads. Since the late 1990s, the battle against icy roadways has translated into an industrywide attempt to find ways to protect wheels and prolong their lives, Braswell said.

However, Steve Nolan, maintenance supervisor at Alaska West Express Inc., Anchorage, Alaska, said his company is not worried about wheel corrosion. The carrier — a unit of Lynden Inc., which ranks No. 32 on the Transport Topics Top 100 list of the largest U.S. and Canadian for-hire carriers — uses aluminum wheels on its 85 power units and steel wheels on its trailers.

“Wheel maintenance is not an issue for us,” Nolan said. “Sure, they get corroded and unsightly, but they work. I cannot remember [the last time] we pulled a wheel because of corrosion.”

Nolan said that AWE does not have its wheels refurbished. Instead, the carrier replaces them.


“If we were to replace a wheel, it would be due to cracking,” he said, adding that approximately 12 aluminum wheels and six steel wheels are replaced a year.

Nolan also said that summer causes more damage to the carrier’s wheels than winter.

“Very seldom do they put anything on the road to combat snow and icing,” said Nolan, who works out of the carrier’s main terminal in Fairbanks. “Normally, when it’s cold, the roads become sticky because [as] the tires warm up [from the rotation], they make the road sticky, and you get pretty good traction.”

What’s more, he said, “In the winter, we prefer snow on the roads, and they actually pour water on them” in order to keep the roads — which are made of dirt and gravel — smoother.

In the summer, Alaskan roads are covered with calcium chloride for dust control, Nolan said.“Our corrosion [problem] is because of the gravel, which will chip the powder coating off the wheels, he said, adding that the Dalton Highway — a primary trucking route — is half gravel in the summer.


But aside from Alaska’s peculiarities, manufacturers echoed the belief that winter de-icing solutions are responsible for the bulk of corrosion problems.

Dale Overton, who is manager of corporate product integrity for the wheels business unit of parts supplier Accuride Corp., Evansville, Ind., said the life of an original wheel depends upon location. Accuride’s products include commercial vehicle wheels, wheel-end components and assemblies.

“I saw a 28-year-old wheel in Jacksonville [Fla.]. I saw one on a snow plow in South Dakota [that lasted only a year. So concern about corrosion] doesn’t apply to all wheel customers,” said Overton, who is based in Henderson, Ky.

He also said, “All wheels aren’t created equal. Different manufacturers [provide] different levels of [protective] coating.”

Ryder’s Perry said wheel manufacturers are testing a variety of products to fight the chemicals.“We’ve been involved in special factory-finished pretreatments to help combat corrosion. We’re seeing good success,” he said, adding that, for proprietary reasons, he could not identify which manufacturers were working with Ryder.

Perry did say, however, that Ryder also has tested various types of vehicle washes in an attempt to remove the chemicals.

“A lot of work is being done with different washes, soaps and detergents that are supposed to help,” he said, but so far, “We’ve not seen definitive evidence that we have a solution that could be used in any market.”

Once the chemicals have penetrated the finish of an original factory-produced wheel, the wheel needs to be shot blasted and repainted. However, the chemicals take their toll on these refinished wheels as well.

Perry said Ryder’s refinished wheels used to last about five years. Now, he said, a refinished wheel that uses a zinc pretreatment lasts about two years and a wheel without the pretreatment may only last a year.

Most refinishing processes shot blast the wheel, then apply a powder coat to finish, Overton explained.Surface preparation matters too.Refinished wheels also “need more paint to make them look pretty,” said Asa Sharp, an engineer, consultant and transportation industry veteran. But “too much paint causes all sorts of problems.”

For example, if the paint film is too thick, it affects the lugs and “there’s a risk of the wheel coming off,” he said. Wheels refinished in the aftermarket “are never as good as the original,” Sharp said. “New wheels have a multistage process to protect the bare steel from the elements.”

He said a few places have set up a longer, more expensive refinishing process that includes a primer under the powder coat. Wheel refinishing is done by retread processing facilities or by the truck tire centers of major tire manufacturers, Sharp said.

Source: Transport Topics

October truck tonnage rose 5.7% above year-ago levels, continuing a streak of nearly two years of continuous growth.

The latest report has moved the freight barometer within hailing distance of the record level it hit almost seven years ago, according to American Trucking Associations.

The trade group reported Nov. 22 that its widely watched freight index reached 116.3 last month, continuing the growth pattern that began in December 2009 and pushing the index to its highest level since January. ATA’s index peaked in January 2005 at 121.6.

On a month-to-month basis, tonnage rose 0.5% from September to October, which was less than the 1.6% month-to-month improvement from August to September.

Source: Transport Topics